.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
KARIBUNI TUHABARIKE, TUELIMISHANE, TUPEANE HABARI ZA KUKUFANYA UTABASAMU KIDOGO NA MATUKIO YALIYOFANYIWA UCHUNGUZI WA KINA TOKA KILA PEMBE CONTACTS: +255 787 377 722 Email: drweyunga@gmail.com PIA UNAWEZA KUNI FOLLOW KUPITIA INSTAGRAM YANGU @drweyunga | TANGAZA NASI ILI UWAFIKIE WATU WENGI ZAIDI.

Ijumaa, 19 Septemba 2014

COURT DECLINES TO GRANT EX PARTE ORDER IN AN APPLICATION BY A TANZANIAN RESIDENT

The First Instance Division declined to grant ex parte order(meaning to grant order to one party in the absence of the other parties involved in the matter) to a Tanzania resident seeking for an interim order that the government of Kenya deposit the amount of 28,475,737 Ksh. to EACJ being decretal amount awarded to him in the civil case at the High Court of Kenya as required under Rule 21 (2) of the East African Court of Justice Rules of Procedure.

The Court said that the Applicant failed to convince the Court the urgency of granting the order in the absence of the other parties and the irreparable damages the Applicant would suffer if the order was not granted.

The subject of the main case is that the Applicant (Alfred Koroso) a business man from Moshi, Tanzania, was arrested and placed in custody at Taveta police station; he was charged of robbery with violence and later acquitted after he was found not guilty.

The Applicant after being acquitted he filed a case in Nairobi High Court Kenya for payment of damages for wrongful arrest, confinement and prosecution by the government of Kenya.

The Applicant claims that the amount awarded to him was supposed to be paid within 30 days from the Date of the judgement of the High Court of Kenya on 25th March 2013 which has never been paid up to date.

Karoso (the Applicant) therefore alleges that the refusal and failure and frustration the decree by the government of Kenya to comply with the Court order is an infringement of Article 6 (d) and 7 (2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.

He further alleges that he has continued to suffer and incurring more damages therefore claiming in the main case to be paid additional amount of 5,086,465 Ksh. plus the decretal amount that was awarded to him earlier by the High Court of Kenya.


The Court has therefore declined to grant the ex parte order and ruled that the Applicant serves other parties in the case and the matter be heard and determined inter party (Hearing the case in the presence of all the parties involved in the matter). 

The Permanent Secretary Ministry of State for provincial Administration and Internal Security is also a party in the case.

Hakuna maoni :

Chapisha Maoni